Monday, November 30, 2009

Golden Gate Park

One of my favorite spots in San Francisco is Golden Gate Park, a mere eight minutes walk from where I used to live. Some guidebooks cite this rectangular piece of land as one of the top must-sees in the city, and rightfully so. Unfortunately, its location away from the main tourist areas makes it less frequented by tourists.

While most locals wouldn’t be caught dead near many of the city’s top attractions – for example, walking around Fisherman’s Wharf, visiting Lombard’s “Crooked Street” or riding one of those touristy cable cars are no-nos for San Franciscans; Golden Gate Park today is a living, functioning landmark which is visited by tourists and locals alike. As a 1000 acre park that is 3 miles long, Golden Gate is larger than New York’s Central Park and dare I say, more varied. Aside from the usual trees and park benches that are mainstays of city parks anywhere in the world, Golden Gate houses a music concourse, museums, windmill, botanical greenhouse, beach chalet plus a roaming ground for bison.

Walking from one end of the park to another is possible, although tiring. Allow at least 4 hours of walking in order to see all the main sights. From the western end, people usually start at the windmill. A curious sight in San Francisco, it was actually built in 1903 as a functional supplier of water.

windmill at the park

the bisons have been here since 1891

From the windmills moving eastward, the next stop is usually the bison paddock, which contain these grazing animals usually associated to the United States. A number of artificial lakes are also located in this section of the park, including Stow Lake and the man-made island in the middle.

the japanese tea garden

Towards the eastern side of the park is the public Japanese Tea Garden, reputedly the oldest Japanese garden in the United States. The five-acre enclosure is a chargeable area, at $5 a pop.

conservatory of flowers

flower beds

The main highlight of the park is probably the grand, white-colored conservatory. It is the oldest building within the compound. During summer, the main lawn facing the greenhouse is filled with elaborately-designed flowerbeds.

de young museum inside the park

I was fortunate to be in San Francisco when the De Young Museum was opened right after the new building was built. They offered free admission as well as souvenirs to the visitors during the first week. There is a viewing deck at the topmost floor that has good views of the park’s long expanse.

street performers during museum launch

SF Botanical Gardens

Other activities: biking, rollerblading, rent a boat, play frisbee, enjoy a free concert

How to get there: Take Bus 5 from downtown San Francisco and get off at Fulton Street. The bus goes through the whole length of the park.

[Via http://wanderme.wordpress.com]

Past Halloween

HALLOWEEN

is big here with many houses being decorated with huge spiders and webs, grave stones & skeletons. The best one that we didn’t take the picture of was a gravestone to ‘Lehman brothers’ and another one to ‘Bankers’.

The was a party on our street with residents cooking and drinking until darkness. Children kept coming with ‘trick or treat’ until 11 pm! Face drawing artists worked on everyone, including me.



[Via http://lubadovgan.wordpress.com]

Friday, November 27, 2009

Afghanistan: next test, last lesson

Paul Rogers,  OpenDemocracy, 26 November 2009
The war in Afghanistan may now be beyond the point where any military-centred United States strategy can work.

Barack Obama is after a lengthy period of consultation moving towards the announcement of a revised strategy towards the war in Afghanistan, now scheduled to take place in a live broadcast from the West Point military academy on 1 December 2009. It is highly likely that the United States president will order a substantially increased deployment of troop numbers to Afghanistan, probably over 30,000 if not as high as the upwards of 40,000 requested by the senior US general in the country, Stanley A McChrystal (see “Obama May Add 30,000 Troops in Afghanistan”, New York Times, 24 November 2009).

Continues >>

[Via http://sudhan.wordpress.com]

A PROPOSTA – 2009 (The Proposal)

Você Casa Comigo e Eu Te Promovo!

Em Cartaz

proposalGênero: Comédia Romântica
Censura: 12 anos 
Duração: 100 min
Direção: Anne Fletcher
Com: Sandra Bullock, Ryan Reynolds, Mary Steenburgen, Craig T. Nelson, Betty White, Denis O’Hare, Malin Akerman, Oscar Nuñez, Aasif Mandvi.
Local de Filmagem: 225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Bearskin Neck, Rockport, Massachusetts, USA – (internet cafe); Beverly Municipal Airport – 46 L.P. Henderson Road, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA; Gloucester, Massachusetts, USA; Manchester, Massachusetts, USA; Myopia Hunt Club – 435 Bay Road, South Hamilton, Massachusetts, USA – (woods); Newport, Rhode Island, USA; Rockport, Massachusetts, USA e Walt Disney Studios, Burbank, California, USA – (studio).
Produção: Alex Kurtzman, Mary McLaglen, Roberto Orci
Roteiro: Pete Chiarelli
Fotografia: Oliver Stapleton
Trilha Sonora: Aaron Zigman

SINOPSE
Sandra Bullock [Speed (1994), The Lake House (2006) e Bridesmaids (2010)]interpreta Margaret Tate, uma executiva bem sucedida do ramo de publicações. Fechada, intragável, competente, odiada e imigrante canadense, Margaret tem um assistente chamado Andrew Paxton, interpretado por Ryan Reynolds [Definitely, Maybe (2008), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009) e Deadpool (2011)] que faz de tudo para agradá-la profissionalmente.

sandyryan041008

Quando chega a notícia de que ela está prestes a ser deportada para seu país, Margaret (Bullock) apressa-se em conseguir um casamento de conveniência com seu jovem assistente Andrew Paxton (Reynolds) para impedir que seu cargo na editora seja preenchido por outro.

No elenco ainda contamos com a atriz, que particularmente adoro, Mary Steenburgen [In the Electric Mist (2009), Four Christmases (2008) e Clifford (1994)], ela interpreta a mãe de Andrew (Reynolds).

682_13560.jpg

CRÍTICA

Da mesma diretora de 27 Dresses – Vestida Para Casar (2008) e Step Up – Ela, Dança Eu danço (2006), Anne Fletcher, aos 43 anos, chega ao seu terceiro longa metragem, dirigindo Sandra Bullock e Ryan Reynolds em seus melhores estilos protagonizando a comédia romântica  The Proposal – A Proposta, filme cuja temática é bem previsível, mas acaba por surpreender, arrancando boas risadas através de um roteiro bem escrito, excelentes atuações e direção impecável.

Sandra Bullock aos 44 anos, está novamente atuando em comédias românticas. Mesmo sendo considerada uma atriz mediana, é indiscutível que nesse gênero ela é imbatível. Outro ponto forte da atriz é a química que a mesma desenvolve com seus pares.

sandra-bullock-in-the-proposal_jpg

Nesse longa, Ryan Reynolds e Sandra Bullock são a perfeita harmonia, é uma delícia assistir aos dois entre tapas e beijos nos conduzirem de Nova Iorque ao Alaska. Ainda assim, são inesquecíveis os pares de Bullock, que foram elogiados tanto quanto seu par com Reynolds, são eles e com eles:

Hugh Grant – em "Amor à Segunda Vista" – Two Weeks Notice (2002);
Keanu Reeves - em "A Casa do Lago" – The Lake House (2006);
Benjamin Bratt – em "Miss Simpatia" – Miss Congeniality (2000);
Ben Affleck – em "Forças do Destino" – Forces of Nature (1999).

O longa é bem humorado, no tom certo, sem exageros, cativante e me arrisco a dizer, uma comédia elegante, daquelas que agradam os maridos, namorados e homens em geral!

1102467_The_Proposal

Destaque para a cena em que Margaret (Bullock) está no palco com Ramone, interpretado por Oscar Nuñez [Reno 911!: Miami (2007), Beethoven's Big Break (2008) e "The Office" como Oscar Martinez (80 episodes, 2005-2009)], um sujeito que mora na cidade da família de Andrew (Reynolds) e que faz de tudo um pouco, garçom atendente de loja e striper para festas de despedida de solteiras. Sim, é hilário ver Margaret (Bullock) fazendo caras e bocas com nojo e aflição do “corpanzil” de Ramone, que diga-se de passagem, é lastimável! Daí a graça toda da cena, é preciso ver para chorar de rir com a cena, é fantástica! Sandra com algumas caretas e aquele famoso “olhar 43” nos passa exatamente toda sua aflição com Ramone, imperdível.

sandra_bullock_bares_bottom_in_the_proposal_main_9630

O desfecho do longa deixa a desejar um pouco, mas só um pouquinho, é que, com tanto entusiasmo durante toda a história, os finalmentes ficaram entre as cenas que a diretora resolveu economizar… Sabem, no orçamento…

Sendo assim, apesar do famoso “happy end” que é o recurso mais tradicional do cinema não ter sido fabuloso, a fotografia e a trilha sonoro compensam esse deslize e nos faz sair das salas de cinema no maior alto astral.

the_proposal04

Não deixem de assistir essa comédia romântica ao estilo elegante que nos mostra que o amor pode estar onde você menos imagina! Em cartaz em todo território nacional. Levem lencinhos, pois rola umas lágrimas. Boa semana a todos!

bom filme!
roberta vieira
http://www.movies.co.jp/ana-muko/

TheProposal_800x600_03

 

Assista ao trailer abaixo!

The Proposal – 2009

[Via http://criticadecinema.wordpress.com]

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Our Naiman: Our corrupt occupation of Afghanistan

By Robert Naiman, ZNet, Nov 25, 2009
Source: t r u t h o u t

Robert Naiman’s ZSpace Page

Is it just me, or is the pontification of Western leaders about corruption in Afghanistan growing rather tiresome?

There is something very Captain Renault about it. We’re shocked, shocked that the Afghans have sullied our morally immaculate occupation of their country with their dirty corruption. How ungrateful can they be?

But perhaps we should consider the possibility that our occupation of the country is not so morally immaculate – indeed, that the most corrupt racket going in Afghanistan today is the American occupation.

US military officials in Kabul estimate that a minimum of 10 percent of the Pentagon’s logistics contracts in Afghanistan consists of protection payments to insurgents, Aram Roston reports in The Nation. In southern Afghanistan – where General McChrystal wants to send more troops – security firms can’t physically protect convoys of American military supplies. There’s no practical way to move the supplies without paying the Taliban. So, like Milo Minderbinder in Catch-22, we’re supplying both sides of the war.

Meanwhile, two thirds of the nearly $30 billion in international aid to Afghanistan has been routed through foreign consultants, companies and organizations hired by the US government and its allies, Farah Stockman reports in the Boston Globe. Afghan officials complain that American civilian advisers are often overpaid, underqualified and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. A typical US adviser earns about $500 per day – several times what the average Afghan earns in a month, Stockman notes. That’s about $125,000 a year – not a bad chunk of change, even by US standards. It’s more than the household income of about 85 percent of American families. The total cost of such an adviser, including security and accommodations (note that most people – in Afghanistan, like the US – have to pay for their own accommodations out of their salaries or wages) is about $500,000 a year.

The Afghan government now has a program to hire its own advisers from friendly Muslim countries like Turkey and the UAE. The US supports this program with a $30 million contribution. But that contribution represents 1.1 percent of the $2.7 billion that the US plans to spend on economic assistance to Afghanistan next year. The vast majority of the funds will be used to hire US contractors. So for every dollar we spend on paying American contractors, we spend a penny on a much cheaper program that allows Afghanistan to hire people who know the culture, speak the language, have more expertise and can move around Afghanistan with less security because they aren’t Americans.

What do you call that? Afghans call it corruption. As Diogenes might say, the big thieves are giving lectures to the little thieves.

Now consider an Afghan policeman making $120 a month – half the cost of supporting a family, Western officials concede, who sees all this going on. Do you think that guy might take a bribe? Bertolt Brecht wrote, in Marc Blitzstein’s translation: “First feed the face, and then tell right from wrong: for even saintly folk may act like sinners, unless they’ve had their customary dinners.” But in practice, our aid bureaucracy in Afghanistan has not yet won this most trivial insight.

Yet the biggest corruption of all is the occupation itself, because it is all based on a big lie: the claim that our continued occupation of Afghanistan is justified by the threat of an al Qaeda “haven” in Afghanistan. This is a lie because: 1) as former counterterrorism official Paul Pillar has pointed out, “the case has not been made” that “such a haven would significantly increase the terrorist danger to the United States” and 2) Mullah Mohammed Omar’s “Quetta Shura” Taliban have been signaling for months that they are done with al Qaeda and there has been no US response. McChrystal wants to send reinforcements to Kandahar. That’s Mullah Omar’s home turf. If McChrystal is given troops to go to Kandahar, then it’s not about al Qaeda.

[Via http://sudhan.wordpress.com]

Random Acts of Photography

The great thing about having a camera on you all the time these days is the ability to upload these to Facebook. My Palm Pre has this feature and I love it. It also gives me the ability of course to take snaps and upload them to my blog. Initially when I started this blog I was taking the pictures with a Canon EOS 5D2 which I have now sold and downgraded or swapped out for a Canon EOS T1i. The 5D2 was a fantastic camera but to be honest it was too bulky and heavy for me to take out and about on a daily basis.

The Trump Tower with it's head in the Clouds

The Trump Tower with it's head in the Clouds

The T1i I have yet to take an opinion on. I had it for a month and it started freezing on me at the most horrendous time i.e. at my sister in laws graduation. I was mortified. I was hoping to get some great shots of her for her album and the damn thing kept freezing while using the flash. The camera is due back from the, in warranty, repair shop tomorrow. I hope it arrives in time as I want to take it down to our friends for Thanksgiving.

Clearly the quality of the images I am taking for this blog has dropped. Here is one I took last December. I suppose ultimately I am just trying to show a sample of my day or a taste of it rather for me and for you. Who are you? Not sure really. I seem to get steady traffic to this blog, although I don’t advertise it but it’s nice you come along to view it anyway. I suppose it panders to the exhibitionist in me such as it is.

The Reflecting Pool

The Reflecting Pool

Once I get my Canon T1i back I want to throw myself back into my photography and get out there again taking pictures. It’s been a while and winter approaches. I hope it’s a snowy one.

[Via http://anthonyjstewart.wordpress.com]

Monday, November 23, 2009

Britain knew CIA tortured detainee

By Robert Verkaik, Law Editor, The Independent/UK, Nov 20, 2009

The judgement revealed Binyam Mohamad was treated the same way as an al-Qa'ida suspect tortured by the CIA
AFP/Getty

 

The judgement revealed Binyam Mohamad was treated the same way as an al-Qa’ida suspect tortured by the CIA

    Britain knew that American agents were using barbaric torture techniques on terror suspects, including British resident Binyam Mohamed, it emerged yesterday. Secret reports sent between MI5 and the CIA in 2002 reveal that the American security services were using torture practices which included waterboarding, facial slaps and stress positions.

    The extent of Britain’s knowledge was made clear in the latest High Court judgment in the case of Binyam Mohamed, who claims Britain actively colluded in his torture while he was being unlawfully held by the Americans in Morocco seven years ago. Mr Mohamed alleges that his torture included the cutting of his genitals with a razor blade.

    Yesterday’s judgment says the treatment of Mr Mohamed was similar to that of Abu Zubaydah, allegedly a high-ranking al-Qa’ida terrorist who was subjected to the 10 torture practices used by the CIA at Guantanamo Bay.

    David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, had argued that revealing details of the 10 torture techniques would threaten Britain’s intelligence-sharing relationship with the US. But President Barack Obama ordered their publication earlier this year and the judges concluded they could refer to them. The first of the two reinstated paragraphs reads: “One of those memoranda dated August 1 2002, from Mr J S Bybee, Assistant Attorney-General, to Mr John Rizzo, acting General Counsel of the CIA, made clear that the techniques [the alleged torture of Binyam Mohamed] described were those employed against Mr Zubaydah, alleged to be a high-ranking member of al-Qa’ida.”

    The rest of the paragraph, which remained redacted from public versions of the judgment, is a quotation from the memo made public by Mr Obama.

    In their latest ruling in the former Guantanamo detainee’s case against the Foreign Office, the judges said: “Of itself, the treatment to which Mr Mohamed was subjected could never properly be described in a democracy as ‘a secret’ or an ‘intelligence secret’ or ‘a summary of classified intelligence’.”

    The human rights group Reprieve accused Mr Miliband of using an “Alice in Wonderland” argument to suppress the details of the torture of Mr Mohamed. Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Edward Davey said: “David Miliband must end this shameful episode now.”

    Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones had redacted passages from a previous judgment after hearing argument on behalf of Mr Miliband that disclosure could jeopardise the UK’s intelligence-sharing relationship with the US. They said the redacted material should be put back in because it was “essential” to their reasoning and no threat to national security. But the passages, apart from two paragraphs to which the Foreign Office no longer objects, will still not be made public yet because Mr Miliband is taking the issue to the Court of Appeal next month.

    [Via http://sudhan.wordpress.com]

    Chain Letters (Mark Rappaport, 1985)

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

    [Via http://cinematrices.wordpress.com]

    Friday, November 20, 2009

    Kuba: "Raul Castro jest równie brutalny jak jego brat"

    Human Right Watch przedstawiła w środę najnowszy raport o łamaniu praw człowieka na Kubie. Wynika z niego, że po objęciu władzy przez Raula Castro w 2006 r., reżim kubański pozostał tak samo represyjny jak poprzednio.

    Raport pt. “Nowy Castro, ta sama Kuba” ma 123 strony. HRW ogłosiła go w decydującym momencie, kiedy prezydent USA Barack Obama chce unormować stosunki z Kubą.

    Z raportu wynika, że są liczne aresztowania dziennikarzy, obrońców praw człowieka i innych opozycjonistów. Poza więzieniem odmawia się opieki lekarskiej chorym, jest bicie przez agentów ze służb bezpieczeństwa i wyrzucanie z pracy.

    - W ciągu trzech lat sprawowania władzy, Raul Castro jest równie brutalny jak jego brat. Kubańczycy, którzy ośmielą się krytykować rząd, żyją w ciągłym strachu, wiedząc, że mogą skończyć w więzieniu za samo wyrażanie swoich poglądów – powiedział Miguel Vivanco, dyrektor HRW ds. Ameryki Łacińskie.

    Raul Castro opiera się przede wszystkim na kubańskim prawie, które pozwala aresztować ludzi zanim jeszcze popełnią przestępstwo.

    Human Right Watch proponuje, by USA w porozumieniu z UE i swoimi sojusznikami w Ameryce Łacińskiej, wywarły presję na kubański reżim, by w przeciągu pół roku bezwarunkowo wypuścić wszystkich więźniów politycznych.

    W zamian za to USA powinno być zniesione. Jeżeli Kuba nie zgodzi się spełnić tego żądania, członkowie międzynarodowej koalicji powinni zakazać przedstawicielom rządu kubańskiego wjazdu na teren kraju i zatrzymać nowe inwestycje na Kubie.

    źródło: www.bbc.co.uk, www.onet.pl

    The Pentagon Budget: Largest Ever and Growing

    by Sara Flounders
    First Published: Nov. 07, 2009 – International Action Center

    On Oct. 28, President Barack Obama signed the 2010 Defense Authorization Act, the largest military budget in U.S. history.

    It is not only the world’s largest military budget but is larger than the military expenditures of the whole rest of the world combined. And it is growing nonstop. The 2010 military budget–which doesn’t even cover many war-related expenditures–is listed as $680 billion. In 2009 it was $651 billion and in 2000 was $280 billion. It has more than doubled in 10 years.

    What a contrast to the issue of health care!

    The U.S. Congress has been debating a basic health care plan–which every other industrialized country in the world has in some form–for more than six months. There has been intense insurance company lobbying, right-wing threats, and dire warnings that a health care plan must not add one dime to the deficit.

    Yet in the midst of this life-and-death debate on medical care for millions of working and poor people who have no health coverage, a gargantuan subsidy to the largest U.S. corporations for military contracts and weapons systems–a real deficit-breaker–is passed with barely any discussion and hardly a news article.

    Physicians for a National Health Program estimates that a universal, comprehensive single-payer health plan would cost $350 billion a year, which would actually be the amount saved through the elimination of all the administrative costs in the current private health care system–a system that leaves out almost 50 million people.

    Compare this to just the cost overruns each year in the military budget. Even President Obama on signing the Pentagon budget said, “The Government Accountability Office, the GAO, has looked into 96 major defense projects from the last year, and found cost overruns that totaled $296 billion.” (whitehouse.gov, Oct. 28)

    Harry Madoff’s $50-billion Ponzi scheme, supposedly the biggest rip-off in history, pales in comparison. Why is there no criminal inquiry into this multibillion-dollar theft? Where are the congressional hearings or media hysteria about $296 billion in cost overruns? Why are the CEOs of the corporations not brought into court in handcuffs?

    The cost overruns are an integral part of the military subsidy to the largest U.S. corporations. They are treated as business as usual. Regardless of the party in office, the Pentagon budget grows, the cost overruns grow and the proportion of domestic spending shrinks.

    Addicted to war

    This year’s military budget is only the latest example of how the U.S. economy is kept afloat by artificial means. Decades of constantly reviving the capitalist economy through the stimulus of war spending has created an addiction to militarism that U.S. corporations can’t do without. But it is no longer large enough to solve the capitalist problem of overproduction.

    The justification given for this annual multibillion-dollar shot in the arm was that it would help to cushion or totally avoid a capitalist recession and could curb unemployment. But as Workers World Party founder Sam Marcy warned in 1980 in “Generals Over the White House,” over a protracted period more and more of this stimulant is needed. Eventually it turns into its opposite and becomes a massive depressant that sickens and rots the entire society.

    The root of the problem is that as technology becomes more productive, workers get a smaller and smaller share of what they produce. The U.S. economy is more and more dependent on the stimulant of superprofits and multibillion-dollar military cost overruns to soak up a larger and larger share of what is produced. This is an essential part of the constant redistribution of wealth away from the workers and into the pockets of the superrich.

    According to the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, U.S. military spending is now significantly more, in 2009 inflation-adjusted dollars, than it was during the peak years of the Korean War (1952: $604 billion), the Vietnam War (1968: $513 billion) or the 1980s Reagan-era military buildup (1985: $556 billion). Yet it is no longer enough to keep the U.S. economy afloat.

    Even forcing oil-rich countries dependent on the U.S. to become debtor nations with endless weapons purchases can’t solve the problem. More than two-thirds of all weapons sold globally in 2008 were from U.S. military companies. (Reuters, Sept. 6)

    While a huge military program was able in the 1930s to pull the U.S. economy out of a devastating collapse, over a long period this artificial stimulus undermines capitalist processes.

    Economist Seymour Melman, in books such as “Pentagon Capitalism,” “Profits without Production” and “The Permanent War Economy: American Capitalism in Decline,” warned of the deterioration of the U.S. economy and the living standards of millions.

    Melman and other progressive economists argued for a rational “economic conversion” or the transition from military to civilian production by military industries. They explained how one B-1 bomber or Trident submarine could pay the salaries of thousands of teachers, provide scholarships or day care or rebuild roads. Charts and graphs showed that the military budget employs far fewer workers than the same funds spent on civilian needs.

    These were all good and reasonable ideas, except that capitalism is not rational. In its insatiable drive to maximize profits it will always choose immediate superprofit handouts over even the best interests of its own long-term survival.

    No “peace dividend”

    The high expectations, after the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, that billions of dollars could now be turned toward a “peace dividend” crashed against the continued astronomical growth of the Pentagon budget. This grim reality has so demoralized and overwhelmed progressive economists that today almost no attention is paid to “economic conversion” or the role of militarism in the capitalist economy, even though it is far larger today than at the highest levels of the Cold War.

    The multibillion-dollar annual military subsidy that bourgeois economists have relied on since the Great Depression to prime the pump and begin again the cycle of capitalist expansion is no longer enough.

    Once corporations became dependent on multibillion-dollar handouts, their appetite became insatiable. In 2009, in an effort to stave off a meltdown of the global capitalist economy, more than $700 billion was handed over to the largest banks. And that was just the beginning. The bailout of the banks is now in the trillions of dollars.

    Even $600 to $700 billion a year in military spending can no longer restart the capitalist economy or generate prosperity. Yet corporate America can’t do without it.

    The military budget has grown so large that it now threatens to overwhelm and devour all social funding. Its sheer weight is squeezing out funding for every human need. U.S. cities are collapsing. The infrastructure of bridges, roads, dams, canals and tunnels is disintegrating. Twenty-five percent of U.S drinking water is considered “poor.” Unemployment is officially reaching 10 percent and in reality is double that. Black and Latino/a youth unemployment is more than 50 percent. Fourteen million children in the U.S. are living in households below the poverty level.

    Half of military costs are hidden

    The announced 2010 military budget of $680 billion is really only about half of the annual cost of U.S. military expenditures.

    These expenditures are so large that there is a concerted effort to hide many military expenses in other budget items. The War Resisters League annual analysis listed the real 2009 U.S. military expenses at $1,449 billion, not the official budget of $651 billion. Wikipedia, citing several different sources, came up with a total military budget of $1,144 billion. Regardless of who is counting, it is beyond dispute that the military budget actually exceeds $1 trillion a year.

    The National Priorities Project, the Center for Defense Information and the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation analyze and expose many hidden military expenses tucked into other parts of the total U.S. budget.

    For example, veterans’ benefits totaling $91 billion are not included in the Pentagon budget. Military pensions totaling $48 billion are stuck into the Treasury Department budget. The Energy Department hides $18 billion in nuclear weapons programs in its budget. The $38 billion financing of foreign arms sales is included in the State Department budget. One of the largest hidden items is the interest on debt incurred in past wars, which totals between $237 billion and $390 billion. This is really an endless subsidy to the banks, which are intimately linked to the military industries.

    Every part of these bloated budgets is expected to grow by 5 to 10 percent a year, while federal funding to states and cities is shrinking by 10 to 15 percent annually, leading to deficit crises.

    According to the Office of Management and Budget, 55 percent of the total 2010 U.S. budget will go to the military. More than half! Meanwhile, federal block grants to states and cities for vital human services–schools, teacher training, home-care programs, school lunches, basic infrastructure maintenance for drinking water, sewage treatment, bridges, tunnels and roads–are shrinking.

    Militarism breeds repression

    The most dangerous aspect of the growth of the military is the insidious penetration of its political influence into all areas of society. It is the institution that is the most removed from popular control and the most driven to military adventure and repression. Retired generals rotate into corporate boardrooms, become talking heads in major media outlets, and high-paid lobbyists, consultants and politicians.

    It is not a coincidence that along with having the world’s largest military machine, the U.S. has the world’s largest prison population. The prison-industrial complex is the only growth industry. According to the U.S. Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, more than 7.3 million adults were on probation or parole or incarcerated in 2007. More than 70 percent of the incarcerated are Black, Latino/a, Native and other people of color. Black adults are four times as likely as whites to be imprisoned.

    Just as in the military, with its hundreds of thousands of contractors and mercenaries, the drive to maximize profits has led to the growing privatization of the prison system.

    The number of prisoners has grown relentlessly. There are 2.5 times more people in the prison system today than 25 years ago. As U.S. capitalism is less and less able to provide jobs, job training or education, the only solutions offered are prisons or the military, wreaking havoc on individuals, families and communities.

    The weight of the military pushes the repressive state apparatus into every part of society. There is an enormous growth of police of every kind and countless police and intelligence agencies.

    The budget for 16 U.S. spy agencies reached $49.8 billion in fiscal year 2009; 80 percent of these secret agencies are arms of the Pentagon. (Associated Press, Oct. 30) In 1998 this expense was $26.7 billion. But these top secret agencies are not included in the military budget. Nor are the repressive agencies of immigration and border control.

    U.S. armed forces are stationed at more than 820 military installations around the world. This doesn’t count hundreds of leased bases and secret listening posts and many hundreds of ships and submarines.

    But the more the military machine grows, the less it can control its world empire because it offers no solutions and no improvements in living standards. Pentagon high-tech weapons can read a license plate on a car from a surveillance satellite; their night vision goggles can penetrate the dark; and their drones can incinerate an isolated village. But they are unable to provide potable water, schools or stability to the nations attacked.

    Despite all the Pentagon’s fantastic high-tech weapons, the U.S. geopolitical position is slipping year after year. Regardless of its massive firepower and its state-of-the-art weaponry, U.S. imperialism has been unable to reconquer the world markets and position of U.S. finance capital. Its economy and its industries have been dragged down by the sheer weight of maintaining its military machine. And as the resistance in Iraq and Afghanistan has shown, that machine cannot match the determination of people to control their own future.

    As the mighty U.S. capitalist economy is able to offer less and less to working people here in the U.S. , that level of determined resistance is sure to take root here as well.

    Source: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16181

     

    Related:

    US Military Spending vs. The World, 2008

    DOCUMENTARY – Arsenal of Hypocrisy (59 mins.)

    DOCUMENTARY – The New American Century (94 mins.)

    Global Warfare USA: The World is the Pentagon’s Oyster

    Pentagon Plans For Global Military Supremacy

    Expanding the Afghan War: The West’s insatiable appetite for Global Military Domination

    Wednesday, November 18, 2009

    Sue Monk Kidd "Bienes hemmelige liv"

    For de av dere som likte ”Stekte grønne tomater på Whistle stop cafe” av Fannie Flagg, kommer til å elske denne boka! Vi er tilbake til gamle Amerika, på den tiden da svarte og hvite ikke hadde like rettigheter. De svarte har akkurat fått rettigheten til å stemme, men det gir dem ikke rettigheter til å få lik respekt som de hvite. I hvert fall ikke i South Carolina.
    14 år gamle Lily Owens bor alene med sin far på ferskengården. Faren er ingen god foresatt, og Lily savner moren som døde da hun var 4 år. Den dagen hennes svarte barnepike, Rosaleen, blir satt i fengsel bestemmer Lily seg for at det er på tide å rømme. Hun rømmer fra faren som går under navnet T.Ray og befrir Rosaleen fra fengsel. Da kommer de til etrosa hus. Der bor søstrene August, June og May som driver med birøkt. Tre vidunderlige skikkelser, og for første gang er det Lily som er den utstøtte. Forfatterens beskrivelse av de tre søstrene er herlig lesning. Absolutt en bok verdt å lese! Har blitt filmatisert med Queen Latifa og Dakota Fanning i hovedrollene.
    November 2009 CL

    USA: An Awesome Reply From CEO Of J P Morgan To A Pretty Girl Seeking A Rich Husband

    Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM

    To:

    Subject: An awesome reply from CEO of J.P. Morgan to a pretty girl seeking a rich husband

     A young and pretty lady posted this on a popular forum:

    Title: What should I do to marry a rich guy?

    I’m going to be honest of what I’m going to say here.

    I’m 25 this year. I’m very pretty, have style and good taste. I wish to marry a guy with $500k annual salary or above.

    You might say that I’m greedy, but an annual salary of $1M is considered only as middle class in New York .

    My requirement is not high. Is there anyone in this forum who has an income of $500k annual salary? Are you all married?

    I wanted to ask: what should I do to marry rich persons like you?

    Among those I’ve dated, the richest is $250k annual income, and it seems that this is my upper limit.

    If someone is going to move into high cost residential area on the west of New York City Garden ( ? ) , $250k annual income is not enough.

    I’m here humbly to ask a few questions:

    1) Where do most rich bachelors hang out? (Please list down the names and addresses of bars, restaurant, gym)

    2) Which age group should I target?

    3) Why most wives of the riches are only average-looking? I’ve met a few girls who don’t have looks and are not interesting, but they are able to marry rich guys.

    4) How do you decide who can be your wife, and who can only be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married)

    Ms. Pretty

    *********************

    An awesome reply from CEO of J.P. Morgan:

    Dear Ms. Pretty,

    I have read your post with great interest. Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours. Please allow me to analyse your situation as a professional investor.

    My annual income is more than $500k, which meets your requirement, so I hope everyone believes that I’m not wasting time here.

    From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you.

    The answer is very simple, so let me explain.

    Put the details aside, what you’re trying to do is an exchange of “beauty” and “money” : Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square.

    However, there’s a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason.

    The fact is, my income might increase from year to year, but you can’t be prettier year after year. Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, and you are a depreciation asset. It’s not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation. If that is your only asset, your value will be much worse 10 years later.

    By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a “trading position”.

    If the trade value dropped we will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it for long term – same goes with the marriage that you wanted. It might be cruel to say this, but in order to make a wiser decision any assets with great depreciation value will be sold or “leased”.

    Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you.

    I would advice that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy. And by the way, you could make yourself to become a rich person with $500k annual income.

    This has better chance than finding a rich fool.

    Hope this reply helps. If you are interested in “leasing” services, do contact me.

    Signed,

    J.P. Morgan CEO

    1) Photo: Courtesy of  http://mndcakes.blogspot.com/

     

    Monday, November 16, 2009

    Flopenaghen? Adesso è una certezza...

    Obamao

    Le notizie dell’accordo a Singapore tra Obama e Hu Jin Tao sul clima non potevano essere peggiori. Lungi dall’intraprendere un braccio di ferro con il presidente cinese sulla questione del suo impegno a limitare seriamente le emissioni di gas serra cinesi entro il 2050, il presidente Usa, che si sta rivelando un’autentica delusione in molti settori, ha deciso, di comune accordo col potente partner commerciale e finanziario, di segare del tutto il ramo peraltro assai sottile sul quale sedeva la conferenza di Copenaghen, tanto che ci domandiamo a questo punto a cosa serva tenerla… In sostanza a Copenaghen non ci sarà la firma di alcun accordo vincolante, cioè con percentuali, scadenze, premi e punizioni, in sostituzione del protocollo di Kyoto, che scade nel 2012. Le difficoltà interne di Obama, che ha una (debole) legge sul clima e l’efficienza energetica approvata alla camera ma ferma al senato,  combinate con quelle economiche e finanziarie (ricordiamo che la Cina detiene un terzo del debito pubblico Usa) hanno prevalso sulle preoccupazioni ambientali. Intanto il mondo continua a scaldarsi, per un’idea precisa degli impatti esaminate la nuova mappa interattiva predisposta dal MetOffice, il prestigioso servizio meteo inglese.

    Obama en Japón: protestas en las calles, muertos bajo tierra y acuerdos sobre la mesa

    Recopilación de artículos

    Protestas durante visita de Obama a Japón

    Más de 20 000 personas se congregaron en la capital japonesa, para exigir el retiro de las fuerzas norteamericanas de la base aérea militar que ese país mantiene en la isla de Okinawa, durante el comienzo de la visita oficial de 24 horas que realizó el presidente Barack Obama a la nación asiática.

    El nuevo primer ministro japonés, Yukio Hatoyama, prometió durante su campaña electoral cumplir con esta demanda del pueblo nipón, que rechaza la presencia de las tropas estadounidenses en Futenma, archipiélago al sur de Japón, donde permanecen 47 000 soldados extranjeros.


    Al respecto, Hatoyama declaró su interés en cumplir esta promesa y puso en entredicho el proyecto de traslado de la base aérea de Futenma hacia una bahía protegida más al norte, suscitando la irritación de Washington.

    Obama manifestó que “esperamos resolver este asunto rápidamente”; sin embargo, Hatoyama alertó que “será cada vez más difícil dilucidar el asunto a medida que pase el tiempo”.

    Extraído de Granma.

    Obama se negó a visitar Hiroshima y Nagasaki

    El Presidente Obama se encuentra hoy en Japón en la primera escala de su visita inaugural a Asia desde que asumiera el cargo este año.

    Obama se reunirá con el Primer Ministro japonés Yukio Hatoyama, cuyo partido electo en agosto proponía en su plataforma electoral la revisión de los vínculos militares entre Estados Unidos y Japón.

    Hatoyama ha manifestado su deseo de retirar una base militar estadounidense de la isla de Okinawa, mientras que Estados Unidos afirma que quiere emplazarla en otro lado. Antes de su llegada, Obama rechazó una invitación para visitar las ciudades de Hiroshima y Nagasaki, que fueron el escenario del ataque con bombas atómicas arrojadas por Estados Unidos hace 64 años, en el que se estima murieron 22.000 japoneses.

    El llamado de Obama para poner fin a las armas nucleares y el premio Nobel de la Paz que ganó hace poco habían creado expectativas en Japón de que Obama se convertiría en el primer Presidente estadounidense en ejercicio en visitar ambas ciudades. Cuando se le preguntó por su negativa, Obama dijo que visitaría Hiroshima y Nagasaki otro día.

    Extraído de Patria Grande.

    Japón y EE.UU. resolverán traslado de base para reafirmar alianza

    El presidente Barack Obama y el primer ministro Yukio Hatoyama acordaron hoy resolver lo antes posible el problema del traslado de una base norteamericana de Okinawa, tema que causa tensiones en los vínculos bilaterales.

    Al defender la alianza entre los dos países en una conferencia de prensa con su anfitrión, el gobernante estadounidense señaló que el objetivo de la Casa Blanca es continuar dándole seguridad a Japón y molestar lo menos posible a la población local, buena parte de la cual rechaza la presencia del Pentágono en este país.

    Obama consideró esencial alcanzar un arreglo al respecto, en tanto

    Hatoyama reconoció que el tema se hará más difícil según pase el tiempo por lo que -añadió- se acordó trabajar con vistas a su pronta solución como forma de fortalecer la mencionada alianza, aunque no se precisaron vías para lograrla.

    La decisión deviene alivio toda vez que el tema preocupa a Washington desde la llegada al poder del gobierno de Hatoyama el pasado 16 de septiembre ante la promesa electoral de que se revisaría el plan mediante el cual esa instalación será reubicada hacia una zona menos poblada de la referida ínsula.

    Con ese paso se busca sacar la base de Okinawa y hasta de Japón, a juzgar por pronunciamientos oficiales que reflejan también la posición de la mayoría de los pobladores de ese territorio. Estados Unidos insiste en que todo debe hacerse según lo acordado.

    El visitante aprovechó la ocasión para agradecer a la otra parte por el anuncio de un plan de cinco mil millones de dólares para Afganistán, uno de los grandes problemas que enfrenta la Casa Blanca.

    La ayuda compensa el anunciado fin del apoyo que Tokío brinda a las misiones de reabastecimiento a buques de guerra norteamericanos en el océano Indico como parte de la llamada cruzada de Estados Unidos contra el terrorismo en el país centroasiático y zonas vecinas.

    Otras cuestiones abordadas en la conferencia poco después del encuentro entre los estadistas se refieren más a aspiraciones que a realidades, al expresar ambas partes la esperanza de ver un mundo libre de armas nucleares -Estados unidos las mantiene en el archipiélago japonés-, lo cual reconocen demorará en lograrse.

    También reiteraron el compromiso de reducir en 80 por ciento para el 2050 las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero, de los niveles de la década pasada.

    Japón constituye la primera escala de una gira que llevará a Obama a Singapur el fin de semana para una cumbre del Foro de Cooperacion Económica Asia-Pacífico, a lo que seguirán visitas a China y Surcorea.

    Extraído de Prensa Latina.

    Friday, November 13, 2009

    Der Dalai Lama und die Südstaaten

    Die chinesische KP ist ja mittlerweile für ihr übermäßig verzerrtes Geschichtsbild allgemein berühmt bis berüchtigt. Besonders das von der Partei geförderte Wiederaufleben des chinesischen Nationalismus in Form eines ausgeprägten Han-Chauvinismus hat die Tendenz zur Geschichtsklitterung weiter verstärkt. Die Ergebnisse dieser rein auf das Überleben des KPCh-Regimes ausgerichteten Verfälschung nationaler und internationaler Geschichte sind bisweilen so bizarr, dass sie wohl nur von eingefleischten chinesischen Nationalisten oder Links- und Rechtsextremisten im Westen für voll genommen werden können.

    In ihren (wenigen) Berichten über das 20-jährige Jubiläum des Mauerfalls wurde der Schwerpunkt auf das Thema “nationale Wiedervereinigung” gelegt. Ein Wink an das demokratische Taiwan, das man möglichst schnell wieder an das chinesische “Vaterland” anschließen möchte. Die Themen “Freiheitskampf” und “Fall des Kommunismus” wurden komplett ausgeblendet. Wer sich Geschichte auf diese Art und Weise anschaut (bzw. anschauen muss), der kann daraus natürlich keine nützlichen Schlüsse ziehen (und soll dies  auch gar nicht tun).

    Anlässlich des bevorstehenden China-Besuchs von US-Präsident Obama wird nun auch noch die Geschichte des amerikanischen Bürgerkriegs uminterpretiert und für nationalistische Propaganda in Beschlag genommen. Der Sprecher des chinesischen Außenministeriums, Qin Gang, verkündete das Folgende, ohne dabei eine Miene zu verziehen und ohne jegliches Anzeichen von Scham:

    “Obama has said in a speech that without the efforts of Lincoln he would not have been able to reach his position,” Qin said. “He is a black president, and he understands the slavery abolition movement and Lincoln’s major significance for that movement.”

    Qin said China’s position is similar to Lincoln’s when the nation abolished serfdom in Tibet.

    China ist also gleich Abrahm Lincoln. Vielen Dank, liebe KPCh. Da haben wir ja wieder was gelernt. China steht außerdem noch für dasselbe wie die folgenden Persönlichkeiten: Winston Churchill, David Hasselhoff, der französische Widerstand, Mutter Theresa, Robin Hood, Sankt Martin und Jesus Christus. Der Dalai Lama dagegen ist gleichbedeutend mit Darth Vader, Hitler, dem Teufel, dem Superteufel, Gargamel und der Hexe aus Hänsel und Gretel.  Damit sollte uns dummen Westlern nun endlich mal klar sein, wie toll und gütig die große KPCh in Wirklichkeit ist. Amen.

    The Late Night Gags Catchup Week

    Late Night with Jimmy Fallon
    Colorado will become the first state to lower the minimum wage. They plan to lower it from $7.28 to $7.25. As a compromise, workers will be able to leave work nine seconds earlier.

    Happy Birthday to Angela Lansbury. She turned 84 today. She celebrated at a party until one of her friends was murdered.

    The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson
    A Republican senator from Maine voted with the Democrats on healthcare. What!?! This is the first time a Republican has switched sides and not been arrested in an airport bathroom

    Late Show with David Letterman
    Yesterday, Bernie Madoff got into a fight in prison. He’s really screwed, now.

    Bernie and another inmate fought over the stock market. Isn’t that how all prison fights start, when you think about it?

    Madoff got into a fight in prison. So they’ve got him on a diet of bread and water . . . like his investors

    The Tonight Show with Conan O’Brien
    The Nobel Committee is saying the reason they gave Obama the Peace Prize is for reducing tension around the world. So, the runners-up for this year’s Nobel Prize were “red wine” and ”the Brookstone 3-Speed Massaging Recliner.

    Yesterday in New Orleans, a little boy asked President Obama, “Why do people hate you?” Then the little boy turned to Joe Biden and said, “I know why people hate you

    The Jay Leno Show
    President Obama won another Nobel Prize today. This time in medicine for pretending to give up smoking.

    Of course, Republicans still can’t believe that Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. But then Democrats can’t believe that Sarah Palin wrote a book.

    The governor of California’s wife, Maria Shriver, was photographed violating the law by talking on her cell phone while she was driving. I read about it on my BlackBerry while riding into work on my motorcycle.

    Wednesday, November 11, 2009

    kierunek:us - nowy przewodnik dla turystów w USA

    Zapraszamy Państwa do odwiedzenia najnowszego internetowego przewodnika po Stanach Zjednoczonych. W serwisie kierunek:us znajdziecie ciekawe informacje o USA na każdy temat. Wiadomości turystyczne, przewodniki po najróżniejszych miejscach, bieżące promocje biletów lotniczych, hoteli oraz wypożyczalni samochodów w Stanach, kupony zniżkowe. Dla tych, którzy chcą dobrze przygotować się do podróży jest też dział z poradami praktycznymi. Serwis kierunek:us jest redagowany przez kilkunastoosobowy zespół ludzi rozsianych po całym świecie: łączy ich jedna pasja: zwiedzanie świata oraz przekazywanie swoich doświadczeń innym.

    Ten bezpłatny internetowy przewodnik po USA został napisany specjalnie dla turystów z Polski. Jest często aktualizowany na podstawie świeżych informacji z pierwszej ręki. Jeszcze nigdy zwiedzanie Stanów nie było takie proste!

    The Mujahid Nidal Hassan

    Nidal Hassan

    Nidal Hassan is a hero. He is a man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people. This is a contradiction that many Muslims brush aside and just pretend that it doesn’t exist. Any decent Muslim cannot live, understanding properly his duties towards his Creator and his fellow Muslims, and yet serve as a US soldier. The US is leading the war against terrorism which in reality is a war against Islam. Its army is directly invading two Muslim countries and indirectly occupying the rest through its stooges.

    Nidal opened fire on soldiers who were on their way to be deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. How can there be any dispute about the virtue of what he has done? In fact the only way a Muslim could Islamically justify serving as a soldier in the US army is if his intention is to follow the footsteps of men like Nidal.

    The heroic act of brother Nidal also shows the dilemma of the Muslim American community. Increasingly they are being cornered into taking stances that would either make them betray Islam or betray their nation. Many amongst them are choosing the former. The Muslim organizations in America came out in a pitiful chorus condemning Nidal’s operation.

    The fact that fighting against the US army is an Islamic duty today cannot be disputed. No scholar with a grain of Islamic knowledge can defy the clear cut proofs that Muslims today have the right -rather the duty- to fight against American tyranny. Nidal has killed soldiers who were about to be deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan in order to kill Muslims. The American Muslims who condemned his actions have committed treason against the Muslim Ummah and have fallen into hypocrisy.

    Allah(swt) says: Give tidings to the hypocrites that there is for them a painful punishment –

    Those who take disbelievers as allies instead of the believers. Do they seek with them honor [through power]? But indeed, honor belongs to Allah entirely. (al-Nisa 138-139)

    The inconsistency of being a Muslim today and living in America and the West in general reveals the wisdom behind the opinions that call for migration from the West. It is becoming more and more difficult to hold on to Islam in an environment that is becoming more hostile towards Muslims.

    May Allah grant our brother Nidal patience, perseverance and steadfastness and we ask Allah to accept from him his great heroic act. Ameen

    By Sheikh Anwar Al Awlaki haafidhahullah

    Monday, November 9, 2009

    day 7 - welcome to heaven

    sorry, dass es so lange dauert bis es hier wieder weiter geht, aber der alltag schlägt unbarmherzig zu…

    aber heute ist es endlich wieder so weit! hier kommt tag 7:

    wir sind nach wie vor in Page, aber heute stand uns ein ganz besonderes (fotographisches) highlight ins haus: der Antelope Canyon.

    aber der reihe nach. nach einem liebgewonnen frühstück (plastikgeschirr, muffin, bagel) ging es nochmal zum Horseshoe Bend. diesmal mit wesentlich weniger wind. dafür mit der sonne im rücken.

    nach einem kleinen privaten shooting ging es dann weiter ins indianerreservat und zum Antelope Canyon. nach kurzer schon im vorfeld geführter diskussion, hatten wir uns für den lower canyon entschieden. dass der canyon idyllisch neben einer fabrik liegt, hatten wir gelesen, dass der spaß recht teuer sei, hatten wir erwartet (da ebenfalls gelesen) und dass die indianer-jugendlichen nicht unbedingt die freundlichsten waren, machte auch nichts, denn deswegen geht man da nicht hin. vielmehr wegen der unzähligen sensationellen eindrücke, blickwinkel und natürlich fotomotiven. und da wird absolut nicht zu wenig versprochen. unseren führer ließen wir nach dem einstieg und dem ersten stopp ziehen, denn wir wollten die zeit fürs fotografieren nutzen.

    wir hatten recht viel glück, der touristenstrom war erträglich, die bekannten spots zeigten sich und wir waren “well prepared”. mit stativen bestückt und wegen des sands verpacktem objektiv machten wir uns also auf die jagd.

    schön ist jedenfalls auch die idee der indianer dort unten zu musizieren. die jugendlichen spielen gitarre und wir trafen noch einen scout für gebuchte touren, der flöte spielte. das ist in dieser atmosphäre wirklich bezaubernd und etwas ganz besonderes.

    ich möchte euch nicht mit weiteren bildern langweilen, denn ich denke, die ganz wahre schönheit erschließt sich einem nur, wenn man selbst dort war. jedenfalls haben wir geschossen bis der auslöser glühte und nach gut drei stunden hatte uns dann das tageslicht wieder.

    noch völlig beeindruckt ging es dann weiter zum Bryce Canyon Nationalpark. nach kurzweiliger fahrt suchten wir uns unsere unterkunft im park (diesmal konnten wir mal wieder reservieren) und machten uns gleich nochmal auf in den park. uns erwartete mal wieder eine komplett ausgewechselte landschaft. sehr beeindruckend wie die Hoodoos wie zahnstümpfe aus dem boden ragen.

    leider war der vielversprochene sonnenuntergang jetzt nicht sooo. zuerst die diskussion, von wo schaut man sich den am besten an (sunrise oder sunset vistapoint? wir entschieden uns aufrund ausgefeilter überlegungen, die ich hier nicht darlegen kann, um den rahmen nicht zu sprengen, für den sunrise point) und dann sowas.

    vielleicht war das auch dann mit dran schuld, dass wir beim örtlich ansessigen pizzebäcker neben einem (typisch pizzabäcker) burger gleich noch eine pizza orderten. was den netten kassierer fragen lies, wo denn der rest sei. etwas peinlich berührt, log ich, die seien noch im auto… was muss der von uns gedacht haben??? aber leider hatte er recht. das projekt war doch etwas zu groß für uns beide. trotz fadenscheiniger durchhalteparolen wie “den rest können wir auch noch morgen essen” und zustimmung in form von “ja klar! kalte pizza ist prima!” landete dann doch leider die halbe pizza im mülleimer von unserem zimmer. aber das war uns erstmal egal. satt und glücklich schliefen wir ein, denn wir wußten schon, morgen gehts früh raus.

     

    also licht aus!

    Chavez Stirring Up trouble, Will Obama React?

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, the same man who has taken control over the media and successfully eliminated term limits making it possible for him to remain president for life, is now stirring up trouble along the Columbian border. Recently tensions have been rising between the two governments. Chavez lines 15,000 additional troops to “secure the border” with Columbia last week in response to escalating violence in the border region.

    Recently the US, an ally of the Columbian government has been allowed into Columbian military bases for the purposes of helping combat drug cartel violence. Chavez, in his intense dislike for the United States, announced on state media that the US empire is using the drug war as a smoke screen to gain access to Venezuelan Oil reserves.

    It’s amazing what you can do when you control the information citizens in your country have access to.

    Chavez’s boldness to the United States and his arrogance is clear evidence that we have become weak and unintimidating as a nation. We are going to find out real fast that when rogue states like that no longer have that healthy fear of us they will exploit it and use it as a way of gaining leverage. This is exactly what Chavez is doing. He is stirring up trouble in hopes to provoke a response from the US, which knowing this administration will be minimal. He is trying to see how far we will let him go without intervening.

    Might I add that being allied with a government means that you would intervene on their behalf if they were attacked for all of you US imperialists conspiracy nuts. So if we did not come to Columbia’s defense we would be breaking our agreement with them. Keeping in mind the president’s encounters with Chavez in the past I am skeptical Obama would take any action if Chavez made a move on Columbia. In fact, I think Obama honestly may be a closet Chavez supporter and in fact might be secretly supportive of Chavez’s actions.

    Now some of you may ask why I say that.

    First of all, the president had a pair of encounters with Chavez that were exceptionally friendly specifically when Chavez handed him that book that essentially condemns America. Secondly, More concrete evidence is found when you look at Obama’s appointed diversity Czar for the FCC, Mark Lloyd. He is a man who has literally praised the “democratic revolution” in Venezuela that led to the shutting down of numerous alternative media outlets. He called it an incredible revolution meaning to me that he obviously has some substantial common ground with this otherwise acting dictator of Venezuela.

    We will watch these developments carefully and it will be interesting how our president responds to Chavez’s provocations. It will be quite revealing as to where Obama stands on this issue and will answer a lot of questions.

    Friday, November 6, 2009

    Gordon Brown and Afghanistan

     

    It is in matters where lives are daily being lost and placed at risk that we need the greatest political clarity about what we are doing and why.

     

    The first thing I want to say is that the removal of the Taliban Government in 2001 was an entirely justified action. The Taliban were hosting Al Quaeda and facilitating their campaign of international terror which had culminated at that time in the murder of 3,000 people in the 9/11 attacks.

     

    The criminal Taliban government with all of its disgusting oppression of women, ghastly executions and maimings had come about because of repeated international interference by world powers. There was particular responsibility by the USA and Pakistan and the previous involvement of Russia, but many nations also had a hand in it. None of this excuses or justifies the illegitimate Taliban government and its crimes.

     

    Al Quaeda is a criminal organisation responsible for mass murder and terrorism. The claims of Bin Laden and his associates for religious justification are of no worth and provide no justification for their crimes. Mafia claims for the moral authority of their ‘family’ values or Somali pirates attempted justifications of ‘policing’ fishing waters in response to loss of livelihood to international fishing are in a similar league to the propaganda of Islamists. Al Quaeda is organised crime like the Mafia or piracy. It is entirely justified to bring these organised criminals to justice and to take measures to destroy their organisations. By the very nature of the threat, these actions have to be international.

     

    Dealing with very dangerous crime originating in another country requires military action, but it is very different from a war. As soon as the language of a ‘war on terrorism’ was invoked by George W Bush the necessary action against Al Quaeda and its supporters was misdirected. In his speech today Gordon Brown has shown that he has not yet managed to disentangle the issues in his mind and his government will continue to fail to set clear objectives in Afghanistan which will result in the unnecessary loss of British and Afghan lives for no purpose.

     

    The Karzai Government is deeply corrupt and its pretensions to democracy have been exposed as completely fraudulent. These are matters which should be of great concern to the Afghan people, but they are none of our business. It is not possible to impose functioning political systems or moral values with armies and weapons.

     

    It is not our business to stop Afghan farmers growing poppies. I will not go into the stupidity of British drug laws, but heroin use in this country cannot be controlled by trying to reduce production in Afghanistan. The demand for drugs in Britain is a British issue which can only be addressed in Britain.

     

    Afghanistan is a multi ethnic place divided by different language, tribal and religious affiliations. For well over a century it has not been effectively ruled by a single government from the centre and there is no likelihood that it will be in the foreseeable future. Whether this problem is resolved by allowing the country to separate into its regional groupings or to form some sort of federal or con-federal relationship is a matter for the Afghan people to work out without outside interference.

     

    The immediate problem is obvious. Invading powers have destroyed the military, policing and infrastructure of the country. With immediate withdrawal of the western powers, Karzai’s corrupt state apparatus would probably fall quickly to insurgents. So what is the solution?

     

    The coalition forces should immediately stop all non-military activity such as school and road building or the administration of elections. The Karzai government must be told to establish its legitimacy by creating an administration that has public support. That can only be done by negotiating with the people who hold power and influence throughout the country. Some of the people they will have to talk to will be armed and may have been fighting to remove foreign influence from the country. This is not the same as wishing to attack the USA or Britain or having delusions about setting up a worldwide Islamist caliphate.

     

    The coalition military should be taken of the streets and withdrawn to defensible bases pending withdrawal. Training of Afghan police and army should be rapidly phased out. If the Afghan government want training for their state forces (and they most certainly need it) such training should be provided by commercial contractors. There are plenty of private companies in the United States, Britain, Russia and elsewhere which are mainly made up of ex military personnel and they would compete for this business.

     

    The pursuit of criminals like Bin Laden, Mullah Omar and their associates must continue as must the destruction of terrorist training camps and elimination of the criminal infrastructure. This does not require mass troops on the ground. It can and should be done by increased intelligence work, special forces operations and precision attacks by missiles and pilotless drones on firmly identified terrorist targets.

     

    Brown has dithered on most things as Prime Minister and Britain has been too eager to follow bad leads from America. Now is the time for clarity and decisiveness. Recognise that it is a mistake to try to export democracy or western attitudes to Afghanistan and pull out the ground troops rapidly. Re-state our determination to prevent terrorist murder on British streets by eliminating criminal organisations whether they are based in this country or elsewhere.

    The Blind Buzz has yet more on accessibility


    10 Honorees Receive Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao’s New Freedom Initiative Award Award Recognizes Achievements On Behalf Of People With Disabilities – Press Release of the Office of Disability Employment Policy. Barriers to USA employment being addressed.


    Accessibility in Windows 7 « Microsoft


    Affordable Assistive Technology Solutions on TechConnect


    Blind people are better at finding their way : Neurophilosophy


    Braille Literacy: An Early Disability Rights Activist Discusses the Paving of the Path


    China Launches First Barrier-free E-commerce Website For Blind And Elderly – ChinaTechNews.com


    Crossing the RSS Divide – making it simpler and compelling « As Your World Changes – get to grips with news feeds and podcasts.


    Descriptive Audio Brings Disney Attractions to Life for the Blind


    Disabled access to websites under UK law | OUT-LAW.COM by Pinsent Masons LLP


    FCC to hold hearing at Gallaudet, Marlee Matlin to participate – The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will hold a field hearing at Gallaudet on disabilities access issues as part of its effort to gather information from experts and consumers for the development of a National Broadband Plan.


    Invitation to participate in a Google usability study – your chance to participate in a survey.


    iTunes 9.0.2 Notes Accessibility Improvements– The Mac-cessibility Network – News [Lioncourt.com]


    Knock Detecting Lock Transforms Your Door Into A Pattern Sensitive Surface, Opens With Secret Knock » ZiggyTek – includes a kewl instructional video, it says here.


    MacSpeech Dictate Receives Update to V1.5.6– The Mac-cessibility Network – News [Lioncourt.com]


    Orca – GNOME Live! – screen reader/magnifier for Linux. Instructions and downloads here.


    Persons with disabilities demand access to computer education – better life awaits Nigerians who have this education, summit hears.


    Social Media for Seniors — Lessons Learned « As Your World Changes


    Super Talent Gives Super Speed in Super Small Package » ZiggyTek » Blog – is this the first USB version 3 drive?


    Teaching Blind Children to Navigate


    The New York Times Addresses Accessibility in Its iPhone App– The Mac-cessibility Network – News [Lioncourt.com] – some apps have become inaccessible in recent updates, but not this one.


    Top Tech Tidbits for Thursday, Issue #233, Tuesday, November 03, 2009 – always topical and useful, so why not subscribe to the
    RSS Feed?


    Ubuntu: the complete beginner’s guide – Times Online


    VMWare Fusion 3 Maintains Accessibility– The Mac-cessibility Network – News [Lioncourt.com] – desktop virtualisation on the Mac stays accessible.


    WebAIM Screen Reader Survey Shows VoiceOver Gains but Downplays Flash Access Issues (Updated)– The Mac-cessibility Network – News [Lioncourt.com]


    Wellness Checkpoint Health Risk Assessment Certified by CNIBs Accessibility Program – important that health management devices are accessible to wide range, says Canadian blindness organisation.

    Wednesday, November 4, 2009

    Blogger Jailed For Anti-Bush Remarks

    The world has not yet come out of the medieval suppression when people either got killed or get imprisoned for life if they are found guilty for exercising their freedom and criticize the monarchs but this time it has taken a leap and taken a new form of national security policies.

    Secret agencies in the name of national security can suppress anyone’s rights and freedom.

    Civil society in USA should take a serious note of these events where innocent people like
    Dr. Aafia and her children or old journalists like Nayyar Zaidi become easy targets of the
    parallel governments in the for security agencies. The prime reasons are similar in these cases
    either speaking for justice, belonging to particular race or religion or it can be the case
    of just fitting in the profile.

    Recent event is of an Indian blogger who was jailed for just making anti-bush remarks over the
    internet.

    Vikram with a highly educated background was pursuing PhD in cancer research and holds an
    excellent academic record.

    Civil society and human rights organizations of the world particularly of USA should
    demand justice for these victims.

    ———————————————————————————————————————–

    Student jailed indefinitely over alleged anti-Bush remark

    Report by Russia Today

    Source: http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-10-15/indian-student-jail-bush.html

    Internet crime is rapidly becoming a major focus for authorities around the world, but the case of an Indian student, jailed in the US nearly three years ago, is being seen as a major test of human rights in the country.

    He was locked up for allegedly threatening the American president George W. Bush via his internet blog.

    Before ending up in prison in 2006, Vikram Buddhi was an award-winning student at Purdue University in the United States, pursuing a double PhD in cancer research. His parents in India have been trying to prove his innocence for over three years.

    “On February 3, 2006, the Secret Service made a formal report saying Vikram Buddhi is not a threat to the US President or any Secret Service protectees,” says the student’s father Dr. Buddhi Kota Subbarao. “Suddenly, on April 14, they arrest him. There is no new development between these dates. So having said he’s not a threat, how he could become a threat in April 2006?”

    Dr. Subbarao is a retired Navy captain and nuclear scientist. His son was eventually found guilty formally, in 2007, of threatening the US President. However, the length of sentence has still not been announced and, without that, the family cannot appeal. Dr. Subbarao believes the entire trial was a miscarriage of justice.


    Dr. Subbarao and his son

    “The jury was not informed of the law, the defense attorney was told to shut up, and the jury’s questions explaining their confusion – the judge didn’t want to clear the confusion, so the jury got fed up and said guilty,” goes on Dr. Subbarao, “So all these show the trial is unfair, a mistrial must be declared.”

    Vikram, 37, is accused of starting a web discussion, calling on Iraqis to take revenge on the US by attacking President George W. Bush. Vikram’s supporters believe he is innocent, because the internet trail does not prove he posted the message.

    “He’s been accused of threatening to kill President Bush. How did he threaten – did he buy a weapon, did he write a letter ‘I want to kill you’, did he buy a ticket to Washington DC? What did he do?” demands the student’s lawyer Somnath Bharti.

    In fact, Vikram’s family believes that he was targeted because a few months earlier he had publicly spoken out against possible racial discrimination at Indiana’s Purdue University. Vikram defended the case of a black student who was expelled for cheating, by highlighting the fact that three white students, guilty of the same act, were not.

    Lawyer Somnath Bharti is sure that “Vikram is an outstanding student who stood against injustice, somebody who speaks up, and such people are not liked.”

    Meanwhile, teachers and students of the elite Indian Institute of Technology are demanding the release of Vikram, a former student. They want the Indian government to put pressure on the American administration to look at the legality of the trial.

    “The government has done nothing for this boy. Even the basic minimum that should have been done for an Indian citizen who is an alien abroad,” points out student Vijaya M.J. “We’re actually dealing with the US which is supposed to be a friendly country right now. When we have [Barack] Obama and Manmohan [Singh, Indian Prime Minister] shaking hands, and one of our students, completely in an unjust way being arrested and jailed in the US is completely unacceptable.”

    They argue web postings are protected by the First Amendment of the US constitution that defends the right to freedom of speech.

    “Even though so much is written about the rule of law and freedom of speech, [Americans] in fact live in a great deal of fear. Not only from terrorists, but also from their own security departments. Now, anybody who says anything about the American [president] will face the same fate,” Dr. Subbarao says.

    What started out as two concerned parents demanding justice for their son is fast becoming an important precedent for the very nature of free speech in contemporary America. For a nation that prides itself on basic human rights and often lectures those who do not comply, it could soon face tough questions over its own laws of liberty.

    Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwfzKX1Uu4s&feature=player_embedded

    Obama's fading star

    Simon Heffer has a useful piece at The Telegraph on how Barack Obama is failing to cut the mustard. Far from being a commanding figure he seems in thrall to the unions, the Democratic machine and special interest groups.

    Many in the media are turning on him and for a country that prides itself on freedom of speech his attacks on the Fox Network do him no good at all.

    As Adam has speculated before, Obama will be a one term President – unless he stops running an election campaign and starts to govern.

    Monday, November 2, 2009

    Warten auf Godot

    Nur zur Erinnerung: ja, eigentlich war letzten Freitag vor einer Woche der Termin für eine Entscheidung über das Anreicherungsabkommen. Ja, genau, die Iraner haben dann gesagt sie bräuchten noch ein paar Tage. Am Donnerstag letzter Woche wollten sie sich schlußendlich äußern. Da gab es auch eine informelle Stellungnhame gegenüber der Internationalen Atomenergiebhörde  – es war weder ein Ja noch ein Nein, ein Vielleicht eigentlich auch nicht. Der Iran hat bis heute nicht offiziell geantwortet. Und alle mahnen wie seit Jahr und Tag. Und erklären sie wollten nicht ewig warten – vermutlich nur bis zum jüngsten Tag. Selbst el Baradei sagt nun erneut, die Iraner sollten sich endlich äußern. Selbst der.

    Allerdings steht zu vermuten, daß allein schon die innenpolitisch angespannte Lage eine iranische Entscheidung intern zur Zeit gar nicht möglich macht. Einen sehr souveränen Eindruck gibt das iranische Verwirrspiel dabei gerade auch nicht ab. Es ist bloß die Schwäche und Standpunktlosigkeit der Gegenseite, auf die sie bauen können.

    Amerikaniserat

    Eller NORD-Amerikaniserat borde jag kanske säga. Ett underligt förhållande till USA råder i trakten.  I morse hittade jag den här huvudlöse G.I Joe sittandes på bakgården och började skrattande prata om den med Carlos -dess skapare. Nej, det är bara på skoj naturligtvis men ändå ett uttryck för frustrationen som råder över de stora skillnaderna grannarna emellan, medgav han.